Ok i sit in the south stand so didn't get a good view. So can somebody tell me why we had 2 pens given against us after saints kicked the ball? (Both towards the north stand) For me whiting should of caught the ball but still i have no idea what happened.

Offside, both looked correct decisions.

offside from them kicking???

Whiting touched the ball it bounced forward, Obst caught the ball.

Same the 2nd time, but think it was Lauaki who caught it after a Hull player touched it.

more confused how we didn't get head and feed after manus' disallowed try?

Haven't got a clue about that one. If Horne touched it, it was after the saints player had already knocked on so surely that was head and feed to Hull??

Agar just said the same thing on RH. Baffling

Foster was gathering in the ball,there was no seperation between him and the ball.The ball was then knocked out of his hand and propelled forward by a Hull player so Saints ball

Yet all of the commentators still believed Foster had knocked on even after viewing a replay?

Yup. I was 50:50 on the Ashe one, he does brush it but they were happy that wasn't a knock on. One of those does less backwards make it forward calls?

The Foster one was the correct call. Foster had the ball under control and it was Horne who took it off him. One on one ball steal technicallly but it goes forward off Horne.

What the comentators think is irrelivant,it went to the video ref and was chalked off rightly or wrongly.Games like this just highlight why a ref shouldnt be allowed to take control of games with his hometown team.Instead of talking about a good game we are talking about the ref,granted a neutral ref may of given the same calls but it would take out any element of hometown bias.

So we may as well not bother having opinions because the ref is always right even if he's wrong! What a boring life you must lead.