At half time why did Agar not take Washbrook off and play Nicklas for 40 mins? Incomprehensible really, unless Nicklas really isn't seen as a long term solution.

At 30 nil we should have stuck another 40 without reply on them.

That was bad

140 surely.

Nicklas is 18 and not in full time training.

Even if it had have happened agar would have been slagged off for letting quins back into it.

We all want to see the youngsters brought through but let's be patient

Are you joking?
30 nil down and you expect a mcdermott team to just give up?

At 30-0 up why didn't Agar see it fit to give Fitzgibbon a rest!!!

at 30-0 up why didn't we bring Blacklock on?????

I've had it with this club!

At 30 nil up we went into half time.
during that half time BM will have torn the emulsion off the walls with his charges and we were happy and content.
second half comes and they mount a charge and have changed a few things on the pitch , line speed, play the ball etc which caused us a few issues for 20mins then they ran out of steam again and we then moved up a gear and finished the game off.
Not rocket science just a decent score with some great rugby momenterally halted by a fightback with pride from the Quins!!
bask in the sunshine of a great win against our bogey team but dont look for dark clouds in a match where there aint any !!

or omeley or cussack or moa or any of the others , I know lets play 7 aside for a while

No need to be a c0ck...

Fitz was blowing and yet he didn’t get replaced, in this time he picked up a knock....no coincidence..

As for O'Meley etc... they were interchanged so I don’t get your point.