What ever we are paying him its a waste of money !!!!!

Funny you should say that because i'm pretty sure the feelings mutual!

I reckon we should play Smurph at fullback.

So do I.

Murphy is a average centre at full back he is better than the british fullback grix !!! Vievers is not a proffessional rugby league player not in a million years !

What we lack in a SH! In there lies the problem with who to select at fullback to compensate for a lack of goal kicker

Last time I checked we had a goal kicking scrum half sat in our reserves. I don't buy into this his defence isn't yet up to standard spiel. It isn't going to improve any playing reserve rugby and who is to say any of the others can defend any better on todays evidence. Why not chance our arm, play murph at fullback, negate the loss of a goalkicker in Vievers by playing Moore at scrum half,and move Lee who is not in the slightest a creative scrum half to hooker with Davey as replacement? He was young Championship player of the year wasn't he? He can't be any worse than what we have already. What are we waiting for?

Also, has Jeremy Smith dropped off the planet again?

Wooooosh

I agree, I think we should give Moore a chance and see how he goes, at the very least it would improve our kicking game, which tbh, is one of our big problems.

Jeremy smith has shown nothing. Is Tony fit? He's got some creative spark but it's whether he can hack it at this level any more

Vievers is an ok fullback but he is not as good as Smurph or Blaymire and for me we should not pick a player just because he kicks goals.

I think we should give Moore a shot next week especially if Rinaldi isn't back.

By the way I would like to put on record that I though James Davey was our best player today.

Why we took davey off is beyond me