So the dust has settled from Friday and he has now had a full season in charge. For me it has been disappointing.

We thought he was a motivator, and yet we have lost every big game this year (both Warrington games and both semi finals). We also lacked killer instinct, losing every game that was closer that 12 points except Hull KR.

We thought he would be good at developing players, yet every player in the starting 17 has either stayed the same or gone backwards bar Goulding, Hock and Hughes who didn't really play last season and Finch who finally settled in. On top of that he didn't give enough experience to the young players who needed it i.e Russell/Murphy, Powell and L.Tomkins. This left us in a sticky situation at the business end of the year with Lockers having to cover at 6, then 9, and Murphy playing in a semi final for his second ever game. Also when Richards was out injured I think it would have been a lot smarter to play Gelling/Hughes at centre and Goulding out wide but I know many will disagree on that point.

Man for man we look weaker next season, so the teams needs to be greater than the sum of its parts. That's the job of the coach though, isn't it? I'm not saying we should get rid just yet, but I'm far from confident that he is the man to take us forward. Thoughts?

For me it is as expected and predicted by many when he took over.

Nobody ever said that his man management and ability to motivate his players was in any doubt and I think that has been proved.

The question mark was always over his tactical ability and I think that has been justified by being dumped out of both competitions due to the wrong tactics.

Can't say I disagree TBH.

Mossop has gone backwards IMHO, at parts he showed what he could do but most of the time he seemed to lose heart. I asked this question after the Leeds SF - Mossop has all the potential in the world, but does he have the bottle? My answer is No.

We do look weaker for next season, I'm far from happy with the acquisition of Blake Green. Waste of money. Wane should of spent the money where we really need it, mainly prop. Powell could of been promoted or Sam back to halves and promoting Murphy.

It's a controversial question considering our final league position but its still valid; Is Shaun Wane the man to take us forward to SL/CC titles?

To be fair, I think Powell would have had more game time and we wouldn't have signed Matty Smith had it not been for him picking up a broken leg in the u20s. With Mellor on loan to Widnes this left us very short of cover in the halves as in my opinion Leatherbarrow will never reach the appropriate standard. We should have given Logan more game time. Personally I am against wholesale rearrangement of the starting 13 and playing players out of position when we pick up an injury or a ban. These are the times we should be blooding the young kids in their natural positions; wing gets injured then we replace with u20s wing, 2nd row injured then replace with u20s second row etc.

But is Iestyn Harris not responsible for our attack ? Just a thought.

At the end of the day the overall responsibility is with the coach, after all its his coaching staff.

Wane has not had a full squad available. Fielden and Roberts took up a lot of salary cap when his oppo coaches didn't have that problem, Prescott has missed a lot of the season.
His mistakes were, not enough pre season friendlies which ended with us losing the first game to Hudds. Playing far too many U20s at Widnes and losing.
Then when Tommy was injured, he left Mellor at Widnes. If he'd brought him back then Finch could have stayed at 6 and Lockers 13.

What he has achieved is that when we hit form the Rugby we played was breathtaking. The Magic game v Saints, wins away at Leeds and Catalans. Then Tommy's injury stopped us, form went and the results too. SW never the less has coached a team to top of the league in his first season which is impressive.
Hopefully with Fielden and Roberts gone the full salary cap can be put on the field. I'm sure that with the size of front row next year and the fact that younger props can do extra minutes should we cop an injury, we'll do well next season.
Like all teams we need a good off season with three friendlies prior to the first SL game so the squad can hit the ground running.

It's a bit harsh to suggest that Wane has made any of the players worse than what they were before. After all many players started off better than they had been under Maguire and then went off the boil late on in the season. I'd say that's down to not managing the team properly over the course of the season and allowing most of the players to peak too early.

Mossop's form dipped like several other players but I don't believe he's gone from being one of the most promising forwards in the country to a poor player in the space of a few months. You don't just lose ability. Early in the season he was matching and outplaying some very good and very experienced forwards so he's clearly got that ability.

It's not the first time a team has looked excellent at the start of the season and then faded badly towards the end and looked lethargic.

I'm not worried about the ability of the players under Wane or concerned that he's making them bad players, I'm worried about his ability to coach a team in a sensible way.

He criticised Madge's approach saying the team could have done better in some games and scored more points and he was absolutely right. The problem is there was a reason Maguire and many other coaches played such a straightforward, simple style of rugby. If you give players license to throw the ball around they will eventually take liberties and go too far in the other direction and stop playing common sense rugby.

Tony Smith found that out at Warrington. You can't just go around battering teams when it doesn't matter and then try to play the same style in big games. There has to be a focus on doing the simple things early on and the reason Wire and Leeds are in the Grand Final is because in big games they've done the simple things well, focused on forwards domination and only chanced their arm if the opportunity arose.
Wire got it wrong in the first playoff game against Saints, tried to overcomplicate things and failed. Yesterday they kept it much more simple and it worked wonders.

In the crucial games Wigan seemed to think there was no need to alter the approach and that throwing the ball wide would work against any team at any time. Too often they would overcomplicate simple plays, like putting the ball through three different pairs of hands only for a forward to drive it up the middle on the 3rd tackle in their own half. There's just no need; it greatly increases the risk for no significant gain.

its all very well spouting what you would have done differently, but their is no evidence or indication any of the supposed resolutions would have left us in a better position.

*opinions*

Said all season I didn't think he would take us forward, and il stand by it. I still think over the next 2/3 years we will go backwards with him coaching us. Time will tell and I hope I'm wrong.

As a leeds fan my opinion of shaun wane is he is a very good coach and i think he has done a great job, yeh we beat you in the semi of the cc, and on friday, but i thought on friday it really could have gone either way, both sides gave it their all.

youve had the best attack and d over the season and finished top, obviously to miss out on OT is a big disappointment for you guys but its defo not all doom and gloom