Richie Myler has now been up before the disciplinary 10 times for tripping opponents , and been found not guilty on 10 occasions , maybe he should be looking to move to football

Except he hasn't. Not bothered to check his previous but for the latest incedent he got a caution so not 'not guilty' at all.

He hasn't been suspended though, for any of the ten citings, which have been over the past three years. He's had a fine, plus three cautions, plus 'NFA's'. Why does he keep getting referred to the Disciplinary people who seem to be of the opinion that they have been trivial offences?

Plays for the right club now though

Well if you haven't checked his previous, how can you comment he hasn't?

Maybe because the OP stated he had been found not guilty on all occasions, it was pointed out that in the last one he was cautioned therefore not found not guilty.

I remember Jerry Seuseu (sorry about spelling) being stood down by the RFL until he sorted out his running style whilst playing for Wigan. Perhaps Richie needs to go on a course to explain to him where his feet go.

How many other players have had 10 tripping offences without any punishment?

Indeed , my wording was wrong , it just seems strange that a player is constantly being up before the disciplinary for the same offence hasn't had a ban , or as has been suggested " sort it or else "

An entry in the match review database is nothing like being "up before the disciplinary". They make a note of any matters the match review panel or referee have suggested need further study. Most are dismissed as nothing or NFA.

Citings number 11 and 12 for Richie, in the Hull KR game. 'No action' ensuing.

Seems Richie Myler has done more tripping than Bez of Happy Mondays fame !